查看完整版本: Barrister Christopher To Had Been Sacked By HKU's Law Faculty!

iluvrachelcook 2017-9-25 11:26 PM

Barrister Christopher To Had Been Sacked By HKU's Law Faculty!

Barrister Christopher To Had Been Sacked By HKU's Law Faculty Over His Inappropriate Comments - Who Will Replace Him?


https://thestandnews.com/

HKFP:港大法律系講師 課堂提強姦案例遭投訴 被校方撤換

英文網媒《HKFP》今日報道,稱港大法律系講師陶榮(Christopher To) 因在課堂上發表有關強姦的言論而遭投訴,校方終決定撤換課堂講師。《立場新聞》向港大方面查詢事件,校方稱基於私隱考慮不會透露詳情。

《HKFP》取得一封港大法律系於本月18日向學生發出的郵件,證實收到學生的投訴,關注有講師在課堂上發表有關強姦的言論。法律系向因有關言論而感不舒服的人表示歉意,並稱在仔細考慮後決定替換講師。

報道引述一段課堂錄音,稱陶榮當時正在課堂上討論「不利證據」,舉例指有一名強姦受害者曾在Facebook吹噓睡過一百個男人,又參加過集體性交活動。被告就會指出該女子是「開放(open)」及「寬鬆(loose)」。陶榮繼而指出,這種情況可能是煽動強姦。

「並不是說她穿著短裙就代表她要求(被強姦),但如果她作出很多煽動,鼓勵別人她喜歡做這種事,辯方會說這是很好的證據:『事實上我真的不想這樣做,但她鼓勵了我。我只是一個男人,我餓了,如果她自動獻身,我該不該做?』」

報道又引述另一學生提供的錄音,可以聽到陶榮在收到學生投訴後承諾不再在課堂上提及性事。他又指該強姦案是真實事件,辯方的確以Facebook作為證據,以圖證明受害者是「要求」被姦,不過法官最後拒絕取用證據。陶榮在該錄音中解釋,提及有關案件只是為了說明網上資料有時並不能適用於《證據條例》第22A條。

錄音中陶榮又指,自己「浪費」了一小時與系主任討論事件,甚至聲稱自己有IT學位,並已記低誰人上課時使用社交網站而沒有專心聽課。如果到時這些學生問為何沒有A+成績,他會回答:「你評估我,我評估你。」

港大回應《立場》查詢,指大學一貫尊重學術和言論自由。法律學院鼓勵老師以專業和恰當的態度,誘導學生認識和了解法律的實際運作。對人事事宜,大學基於私隱考慮不會透露詳情。

https://www.hongkongfp.com/2017/09/25/hku-law-department-replaces-instructor-following-rape-related-comments-made-class/

[attach]7374547[/attach]

[attach]7374548[/attach]

[attach]7374549[/attach]

[attach]7374550[/attach]

[attach]7374551[/attach]

[attach]7374552[/attach]

bola2000 2017-10-9 11:31 PM

我都上過chris to 課。雖然佢都唔係教得好好,唔覺得佢以前有咁大問題?

以前上evidence 跟wesley wong (sc)學,無試過咁生動咁教。都係簡簡單單又一堂咁。

henrypottinger 2017-10-17 05:13 PM

Barrister Christopher To is an idiot. 陶榮大律師正白痴! Barrister Christopher To simply did not have sufficient experience in criminal litigation to be talking about it at all.

https://m.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20170926/s00002/1506364586108

講強姦案惹投訴 港大教授被撤換

昨日有網媒報道,香港大學法律學院客席教授陶榮(Christopher To)早前在課堂上教授強姦案舉證時,舉例若女受害人曾在社交媒體吹噓自己曾跟百名男士睡覺,他建議可將行為辯解為「刺激他人強姦」。報道指有學生感到不舒服並就此投訴,法律學院其後撤換導師。

網媒Hong Kong Free Press昨報道指曾接觸涉事學生,又取得課堂錄音,指陶榮於今年9月初上課時教授強姦案舉證,提到若女受害人曾於社交媒體吹噓自己曾跟百名男士睡覺,或曾參與集體性行為,被告可指該女受害人「開放」,陶榮建議該情况可視作刺激他人強姦(incitement of rape)。

報道又指出,陶榮之後再舉例,稱若女受害人穿短裙及有煽動行為,辯方可指女受害人有意煽動,其中又提及「我只是男人,我會『飢餓』( I'm just a man, I get hungry)」。報道指,有關言論令部分學生感到不舒服並就此投訴,法律學院其後因事件撤換導師。

新聞來源連結:

https://m.mingpao.com/pns/dailynews/web_tc/article/20170926/s00002/1506364586108

martinlee119 2017-11-14 03:52 AM

[quote]原帖由 [i]henrypottinger[/i] 於 2017-10-17 05:13 PM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=469510965&ptid=26951033][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Barrister Christopher To is an idiot. 陶榮大律師正白痴! Barrister Christopher To simply did not have sufficient experience in criminal litigation to be talking about it at all.

https://m.mingpao.com/ ... [/quote]
Had Barrister Christopher To ever done a single criminal trial as an advocate in his entire life?

amychiu 2017-12-16 12:24 AM

Christopher To is NOT a qualified barrister.

Aofe 2018-1-18 12:22 AM

女權

harefoot1040 2018-2-1 09:47 PM

[quote]原帖由 [i]henrypottinger[/i] 於 2017-10-17 05:13 PM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=469510965&ptid=26951033][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Barrister Christopher To is an idiot. 陶榮大律師正白痴! Barrister Christopher To simply did not have sufficient experience in criminal litigation to be talking about it at all.

https://m.mingpao.com/ ... [/quote]
Had Barrister Christopher To ever done a single criminal trial as an advocate in his entire life? x2

If he had no real experience doing real criminal trials he should just shut up, resign, and let people with more relevant experiences replace him.

jleung15 2018-2-9 03:58 PM

[quote]原帖由 [i]harefoot1040[/i] 於 2018-2-1 09:47 PM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=474705771&ptid=26951033][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

Had Barrister Christopher To ever done a single criminal trial as an advocate in his entire life? x2

If he had no real experience doing real criminal trials he should just shut up, resign, and let p ... [/quote]
I agree if Barrister Christopher To had no or insufficient real experience doing real criminal trials inside real criminal courts he should just shut up, resign, and let people with more relevant experiences replace him.

lindachung4ever 2018-3-25 01:27 AM

If Barrister Christopher To had no or insufficient real experience doing real criminal trials inside real criminal courts he should just shut up, resign, and let people with more relevant experiences replace him x2

joyceleung2002 2018-4-11 03:04 AM

[quote]原帖由 [i]henrypottinger[/i] 於 2017-10-17 05:13 PM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=469510965&ptid=26951033][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Barrister Christopher To is an idiot. 陶榮大律師正白痴! Barrister Christopher To simply did not have sufficient experience in criminal litigation to be talking about it at all.

https://m.mingpao.com/ ... [/quote]
HKU should never have allowed such an inexperienced idiot to be teaching criminal evidence.  Only people with real and substantial criminal litigation experience in the criminal courts in HK should be allowed to teach criminal evidence.

koreanbbq2 2018-4-15 04:13 AM

[quote]原帖由 [i]joyceleung2002[/i] 於 2018-4-11 03:04 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=478329167&ptid=26951033][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

HKU should never have allowed such an inexperienced idiot to be teaching criminal evidence.  Only people with real and substantial criminal litigation experience in the criminal courts in HK should b ... [/quote]
Christopher To simply did not have the necessary experience to teach anything related to criminal litigation or criminal evidence.
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: Barrister Christopher To Had Been Sacked By HKU's Law Faculty!