註冊 登入



打印

[航空業界] Qantas Perth to London lanuch in March 2018

[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 boot291 於 2017-4-27 03:37 PM 發表



That makes a lot of sense theoretically but they are selling domestic tickets on this leg as someone pointed out. Will be interesting to see how they solve these logistics issues.

If there is n ...
But I guess we will have to wait and see. I don't think Qantas themselves have figured out exactly how to approach that and they still got an year to sort it out.



熱門搜尋: 汽車保險 貸款 家居保險

回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 ae86_tureno 於 2017-4-27 03:47 PM 發表



Interesting, it's as if they have opened booking but say please please please don't book it. lol

I guess we will see how they will handle that part. I guess Qantas themselves haven't got the de ...
It will be interesting if they have to make so many changes just for one flight? Australia must be placing a really great emphasis on this.

LAX didn't change its policy (in fact all US ports) of all passengers deplaning to facilitate QF's SYD-LAX-JFK flight.







引用:
原帖由 ae86_tureno 於 2017-4-27 03:31 PM 發表



I believe they have said all along that they will rearrange that, with changes being made to the terminal at Perth as well.

So I believe they won't be selling domestic tickets for the PER-MEL l ...
From the press release,it seems to me that it will be a same plane from Melbourne to London. Maybe the customers need not leave the plane from the whole trip from Melbourne to London






回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 boot291 於 2017-4-27 03:52 PM 發表



It will be interesting if they have to make so many changes just for one flight? Australia must be placing a really great emphasis on this.

LAX didn't change its policy (in fact all US ports) o ...
They are LAX, they are Americans, and of cos they won't do anything to help an Australian airline.

Meanwhile Perth is Australia's own hub, renovating for a dedicated gate shouldn't be too big a deal really. It is not like they have to build a whole new extension to a building or build something new from the ground up? And it's to benefits the travel experience for Australians themselves too.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016- ... w-continues/8074510

the news article from November last year.



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 ae86_tureno 於 2017-4-27 04:07 PM 發表



They are LAX, they are Americans, and of cos they won't do anything to help an Australian airline.

Meanwhile Perth is Australia's own hub, renovating for a dedicated gate shouldn't  ...
That's why SYD-JFK non stop is next on QF's drawing board..20 hours non stop

Currently planned for 2020



回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 Canadaman 於 2017-4-27 13:03 發表

18 hours in 3-3-3 787 economy, is this some form of medieval torture? QF may not have stretch racks, but they certainly have squish racks.
From another view ,QF’s 787 can be considered to be  the most generous within QF long haul aircrafts .
787 is the only type aircraft in QF ,which offers 32” seat pitch in economy class



引用:
原帖由 kirstyu2 於 2017-4-27 11:59 AM 發表

但價錢比經DXB貴
但如果係由 SYD 出發的話,經 PER 只係比經 DXB 貴 A$10 咋喎。

不過我唔明白點解去倫敦一定要用 LHR,LHR 入境查得咁嚴,又等得耐,點解唔用啲細啲的 Port,例如 LCY,LGW,STN 等等,方便乘客入境?







引用:
原帖由 TP1095 於 2017-4-27 07:10 PM 發表



但如果係由 SYD 出發的話,經 PER 只係比經 DXB 貴 A$10 咋喎。

不過我唔明白點解去倫敦一定要用 LHR,LHR 入境查得咁嚴,又等得耐,點解唔用啲細啲的 Port,例如 LCY,LGW,STN 等等,方便乘客入 ...
B789 經濟艙比A388細好多,少200個位,overall fare一定比較貴






Who would want to fly such long flight in Y cabin probably transit flight is better ...

Btw read somewhere else that QF will be operating this MEL-PER sector as domestic flight, but charging a sky-high fare to give way to international pax.



熱門搜尋: 孕婦飲食 嬰兒床 產前講座 人奶 初生嬰兒 奶粉 妊娠紋
[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 boot291 於 2017-4-27 03:25 PM 發表


It may be hard to arrange that, unless QF won't sell the domestic PER-MEL leg on that aircraft.

Else, how do they separate the domestic and international passengers arriving in MEL? The domestic and international flights are processed in two different terminals in MEL.

Interestingly, how do domestic passengers on the PER-MEL leg board this aircraft in Perth as the aircraft will arrive at the international terminal? Will the aircraft be moved to the domestic terminal after the passengers deplaned and then all the passengers travelling onward to MEL transfer to the domestic terminal by bus? That sounds crazy lol.
I think Qantas will also sell the PER-MEL later. Passenger will need to go through immigration and pickup their luggage at PER, before heading the second sector for MEL.

But Qantas also announced earlier that all European non-stop flights from PER will depart at DOMESTIC Terminal! They have asked the Perth airport to modify part of its domestic terminal for European international flight. LHR will be the first destination, while FRA or CDG may follow later. All these European international flights from PER will depart from DOMESTIC Terminal.  

Advantage of MEL-PER-LHR instead of the current MEL-DXB-LHR, perhaps is the ALL-Qantas transit facility, or in other words, Qantas has more voice on the transit location. (E.g. Qantas can ask the PER airport to do this and to that, while it cannot ask the DXB airport to do anything.)







回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 kirstyu2 於 2017-4-27 19:19 發表


B789 經濟艙比A388細好多,少200個位,overall fare一定比較貴
B789三艙座位數大幅減少,減少售票壓力,自然定價較進取。



回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 SLGO 於 2017-4-27 07:53 PM 發表

Who would want to fly such long flight in Y cabin probably transit flight is better ...

Btw read somewhere else that QF will be operating this MEL-PER sector as domestic flight, but chargi ...
即使 MEL-PER sector 唔賣高價,你都唔會搭 QF9/10 往返兩地啦!

搭呢班機,即使係 Domestic, 都要先出境再入境,出境唔麻煩,但入境麻煩嘛!要過海關,有生果肉類又唔帶得,邊個會咁得閒走去過海關?

仲有,唔帶護照就無得搭;相反,Domestic 即使無 ID 都可以上到機。

最後,我同意咁長途機搭 F/J 會好啲,但對 Y 就簡直虐待。如果我係 Y 客就梗係坐新加坡航空或者國泰航空轉機啦!起碼服務好過澳洲航空,連野食都大份過人!



實用相關搜尋: 航空
引用:
原帖由 TP1095 於 2017-4-28 07:57 AM 發表




即使 MEL-PER sector 唔賣高價,你都唔會搭 QF9/10 往返兩地啦!

搭呢班機,即使係 Domestic, 都要先出境再入境,出境唔麻煩,但入境麻煩嘛!要過海關,有生果肉類又唔帶得,邊個會咁得閒走去過海關?

仲有,唔 ...
轉機肯定平好多是事實,服務可能都好啲,不過時間價值可以好高。







回覆 引用 TOP

引用:
原帖由 TP1095 於 2017-4-28 07:57 AM 發表




即使 MEL-PER sector 唔賣高價,你都唔會搭 QF9/10 往返兩地啦!

搭呢班機,即使係 Domestic, 都要先出境再入境,出境唔麻煩,但入境麻煩嘛!要過海關,有生果肉類又唔帶得,邊個會咁得閒走去過海關?

仲有,唔 ...
CX 個餐大份d?不予置評



回覆 引用 TOP

[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 TP1095 於 2017-4-28 07:57 AM 發表




即使 MEL-PER sector 唔賣高價,你都唔會搭 QF9/10 往返兩地啦!

搭呢班機,即使係 Domestic, 都要先出境再入境,出境唔麻煩,但入境麻煩嘛!要過海關,有生果肉類又唔帶得,邊個會咁得閒走去過海關?

仲有,唔 ...
WTF are you talking about?



 提示:支持鍵盤翻頁 ←左 右→
[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]





重要聲明:本討論區是以即時上載留言的方式運作,香港討論區對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意 見,並非本網站之立場,讀者及用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,讀者及用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者及用戶發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。香港討論區有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言 (刪除前或不會作事先警告及通知 ), 同時亦有不刪除留言的權利,如有任何爭議,管理員擁有最終的詮釋權 。用戶切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。


Copyright©2003- Discuss.com.hk Limited. All Right Reserved.
版權所有,不得轉載。