查看完整版本 : 點解我做個文員仔都要咁...

rockman446260 2013-5-5 07:26

大佬阿有時大細草係咪真係咁緊要阿???
執到正一正,又唔一次過指晒D錯處出黎,
等我Print 3,4次先攪掂一份文件,
鬧都鬧到我傻... 律師係咪痴線嫁:smile_27:

遲禧太后 2013-5-5 11:06

[quote]原帖由 [i]rockman446260[/i] 於 2013-5-5 07:26 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=360516022&ptid=21861315][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
大佬阿有時大細草係咪真係咁緊要阿???
執到正一正,又唔一次過指晒D錯處出黎,
等我Print 3,4次先攪掂一份文件,
鬧都鬧到我傻... 律師係咪痴線嫁:smile_27: [/quote]

大細草爭好遠喎,我實要執到啱先收貨。其實你自己睇多幾次先攞出來,減少錯誤,咁先係有效率工作嘛。



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

rockman446260 2013-5-5 11:09

我已經俾人鬧到驚~ 唔想做喇~
夜夜訓覺都發惡夢~
律師好恐怖~

mmljf 2013-5-5 11:21

那只能說你不適合做呢一行 如果你仲想做呢行 工作態度應該積極d先 你老闆其實期望你自己改好曬d野 包括大小草呢d minor mistake先遞份野比佢



[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]

rockman446260 2013-5-5 12:12

佢連你阿爸阿媽都鬧埋,傻的嗎?

mmljf 2013-5-5 12:50

好多老世講野都好尖酸刻薄  唯有自己做好d 受完氣 收工就唔帶d情緒番屋企 我自己會檢討左自己先
好老世都有 不過少 我做過老世好好人的公司 但因為同事講野好刻薄就辭職了 所以其實走唔走 分別不大 都系對自己要求高d 做好本分最實際



[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]

rockman446260 2013-5-5 13:06

好慘~ 想轉行都唔係咁易~
你做開Law去第二行又要重新開始~

若缺齋老人 2013-5-5 16:28

唔想做冇所謂,如果想做的唔該糾正左基本概念先,法律文件大細草錯真係[color=Red]非常嚴重的錯誤[/color]。

[quote]原帖由 [i]rockman446260[/i] 於 2013-5-5 11:09 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=360526018&ptid=21861315][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
我已經俾人鬧到驚~ 唔想做喇~
夜夜訓覺都發惡夢~
律師好恐怖~ [/quote]

IvanC_C 2013-5-6 21:20

[quote]原帖由 [i]rockman446260[/i] 於 2013-5-5 07:26 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=360516022&ptid=21861315][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
大佬阿有時大細草係咪真係咁緊要阿???
執到正一正,又唔一次過指晒D錯處出黎,
等我Print 3,4次先攪掂一份文件,
鬧都鬧到我傻... 律師係咪痴線嫁:smile_27: [/quote]

your boss is right to be strict on the upper/lower cases, as the meaning of a defined term (in upper case) may differ greatly with the general term!

if you want to survive in the legal industry, you'd better be extra careful with documents.



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

jimbo86 2013-5-7 01:20

the problem to the typist is only letters upper case /lower case.
the the lawyers that can means whether he will have a job tomollo, get paid, party to the law suit a deal worth as much as the number on the contract.
some boss never thought about their workers.
but in reality even a beggar on the road side can save your derriere too!
some of us will only learn when it had happened.
let alone dealing with staffs, some lawyers do treat other surrounding folks real bad too. so one day should u see that he/she is walking into a big trap, u think u will be shouting at him/her to stop?
we all need to realize others have feelings and dignity too.
even the lowly folks who had to clean out latrines.  
what goes around comes around anyways.

ryuken31 2013-5-8 04:44

你轉行啦都係

kingme 2013-5-8 07:07

好老實...你咁嘅態度唔得...

即係冇人鬧你...你都要自己諗吓係咪啱呢行...

[[i] 本帖最後由 kingme 於 2013-5-8 07:12 AM 編輯 [/i]]

Elleen 2013-5-8 13:37

[size=5]damage 同 damages, 有s同冇s嘅解釋就有好大分別[/size]
[size=5][/size]
[size=5]China 同 china 嘅解釋就有好大分別[/size]
[size=5][/size]
[size=5]Turkey 同 turkey 嘅解釋就有好大分別[/size]
[size=5][/size]
[size=5]Japan 同 japan 嘅解釋就有好大分別[/size]
[size=5][/size]
[size=5]pant 同 pants 嘅解釋就有好大分別[/size]
[size=5][/size]
[size=5]glass 同 glasses 嘅解釋就有好大分別
[size=5][/size]
[/size]
[size=5][/size]

[size=5][/size]

[[i] 本帖最後由 Elleen 於 2013-5-8 06:53 PM 編輯 [/i]]

irisleungiokfan 2013-5-8 15:33

唔好難過,收拾心情! 無人會比人罵仲笑笑口,唔通有特殊嗜好咩!

legal呢行d人係咁,d野因為同法律有關,明白執得緊,review多幾次係正常~佢地分幾次去改,可能係再睇先發現有問題呢!改得緊好過出左街先知賴野,係咪!

但好認同佢地d manner可以好d! 明白比人咁話好難受!

ePilot 2013-5-8 18:31

[quote]原帖由 [i]若缺齋老人[/i] 於 2013-5-5 16:28 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=360548528&ptid=21861315][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]唔想做冇所謂,如果想做的唔該糾正左基本概念先,法律文件大細草錯真係非常嚴重的錯誤。 [/quote]個字大草同細草可以唔同咗意思。你話呢



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/android][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg[/img][/url]

jimbo86 2013-5-9 01:56

Now think about it, my first job I got shit from people about my poor writing,  numbers were badly written border line illegible.
After so many yrs my writing is probably working backward too and not any easier to read. There're times I looked at my own signature, i almost say thats not signed by yours truly.
Somedays if I am lazy I dont even use the cap or shift button, so is all lower case. One guy in a car chat room raised his objection.
The way I eat is clearly came from a lower class too. I never bother to learn the proper etiquette. Then again even Queen Lizzie aka QEII has to drink the hand water with her distinguished
guests too.

The issue as u're an entry level clerk u do need to pay extra undivided attention to all these minute details.
U do need to pay more attention at work, sleep enough and dont do other things when u work.
Same reason I enjoy cycling , driving as I do need undivided attention and not think about anything else , or else i will be dead meat!
Unfortunately we all need to do things to survive in this world.
Perhaps u need to look for a more sympathetic bozz.

[[i] 本帖最後由 jimbo86 於 2013-5-14 03:48 PM 編輯 [/i]]

ladykin 2013-5-9 11:39

律師寫的每一封信,將來都有機會在法庭內成為呈堂証據,故你老闆所採用的嚴謹程度是可以理解。
我個人不認同律師用操口鬧下屬,有本事出高些人工,便可請到有質素的文員。
如樓主沒有興趣與文字打交道,可以向老闆說明或乾脆轉行。



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

yiyiallall 2013-5-11 08:20

改極都仲有錯比人問候是正常吧
唔少行家真係唔會嘥氣同你講咁多,叫老闆炒你就炒你

hochiuwan886 2013-5-23 14:50

如果係咁就話唔做,咁易就放棄,你日後都只會不斷錯落去,以後你更加應該要細心CHECK多幾次,先SEND比律師睇

LLB1234 2013-5-23 17:19

Lawyers charge for every letter / document they write.  If it is not perfect, clients will complaint.

Imagine, if you buy a PP watch, Hermes bag or Ferrari car, will you accept the goods if it is not in perfect condition?

That said, some lawyers do have unreasonable demands.  There are rumours that a female lawyer will fine her assistants for dropping paper clips on the floor . . .

godonee

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

CrossRoader 2013-5-23 23:12

Sadly for you a legal clerk's duties include word-processing.



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

LLB1234 2013-5-24 00:54

Think on the bright side, it might be an opportunity to move from a clerk to a legal clerk.



[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]

LLL817 2013-6-2 15:49

要留在律師行工作, 就要配備合適的條件, 否則, 早晚都會因為不同的原因, 需要離開及轉行.
有甚麼是必須的條件? 至少文件內容的準確性要非常非常非常高.
甚麼改完再改再改再改? 有需要就要改的啦!

huiyusum123 2013-6-5 12:27

鬼叫你只係文員,而唔係點你做野既律師咩,

858 2013-6-10 11:22

其實倒返轉頭諗, 出糧張支票錯又有冇問題呢? 樓主好好考慮下呢個問題
仲有, 只有老師先會改功課, 大個仔仲要人改功課咁睇你D野, 你不如返學校啦:smile_45:

suenman0 2013-6-10 21:21

[quote]原帖由 [i]rockman446260[/i] 於 2013-5-5 07:26 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=360516022&ptid=21861315][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
大佬阿有時大細草係咪真係咁緊要阿???
執到正一正,又唔一次過指晒D錯處出黎,
等我Print 3,4次先攪掂一份文件,
鬧都鬧到我傻... 律師係咪痴線嫁:smile_27: [/quote]
律師係鐘意同一個字執3-4次
最後又決定唔轉:smile_42:

BUT, 大小草又真係幾重要, 唔錯得
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 點解我做個文員仔都要咁...