查看完整版本 : 其實而家D 律師係唔係搵得三幾皮一個月?

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

jimbo86 2013-6-27 14:56

whether they make 30 or 300k /mth , will it make any difference to your well being?
u not happy with your bf or gf's performance? For a moment i thought u're living the avails from them.

kin_kin_kin 2013-6-27 15:17

agree



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

曹雪芹 2013-6-27 16:32

香港社會係講供求,而薪酬由供求主導。
3萬亦都未嘗不可,都唔錯啦。

有人退隱歸回,有人趕科場。
尊重人地,人地自然尊重你

jimbo86 2013-6-27 16:45

see if u can get the idea from here.
I dont write chinese, solly.
Living off the Avails of Prostitution

Under Section 212 of the Criminal Code of Canada, it is an offence to live entirely or in part off of the avails or profits of prostitution. This law is meant to target pimps whose main source of income is prostitution. This offence is not applied to prostitutes as the main offender but to those who make money off of the prostitution of others.



This offence is not meant to punish a relationship of a legitimate living arrangement; the mere sharing of expenses between two people, where one of them is a prostitute, is not enough to satisfy this offence. There must be a direct benefit to one person from the prostitution of another.



This offence carries with it a reverse onus provision. That means, once the Crown proves that a person is living with or routinely in the company of a known prostitute, it can be presumed that the person is living off the avails of prostitution unless the accused provides evidence showing that he was not. This means the accused must raise a reasonable doubt that although they are living with a prostitute, they are not receiving a direct benefit from it. This may involve showing that they have another source of income. However, using wages from prostitution to support children is not illegal even though the children are receiving a direct benefit.



Living off the avails of prostitution is an indictable offence and punishable by a term of imprisonment of not more than 10 years. If the prostitute is under the age of 18, the potential maximum sentence is 14 years with a minimum sentence of 2 years. If violence is used or threatened there is a minimum 5 year sentence.

yiyiallall 2013-6-27 18:19

Agree with kin kin kin and jimbo above
:smile_30:

CrossRoader 2013-6-27 18:41

人講你就信



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

秋官!

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

秋官!

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

秋官!

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

onleemore 2013-6-28 00:24

世上愚民多的是



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/android][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg[/img][/url]

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

rayleung8838

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

x747x 2013-6-28 02:41

聽聞有個律師樓合伙人,律師樓喺中環甲級商廈,做咗廿幾年以上,住干德道,月薪差唔多有大半架 Benz A-Class。

random2162013 2013-6-28 04:58

[quote]原帖由 [i]rayleung8838[/i] 於 2013-6-27 09:17 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365727242&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
咁梅,真慘! [/quote]

我識嘅律師多數搵緊三十幾萬一個月.  最差嗰個都十三萬一個月.  我諗人人唔同.



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

CrossRoader 2013-6-28 08:35

咁你想做律師而家開始讀都唔遲 我諗會好過你坐係度咩都唔知 酸葡萄 亂咁講野抵毀人 浪費時間



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

onleemore 2013-6-28 09:04

[quote]原帖由 [i]rayleung8838[/i] 於 2013-6-28 12:38 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365790085&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]

你好彩,有幾會讀書姐,我只係輸係起跑綫上姐,十幾歲至落黎香港,唔喺嘅話,做律師話都無咁易啦 [/quote]
that's the reality.

onleemore 2013-6-28 09:06

[quote]原帖由 [i]random2162013[/i] 於 2013-6-28 04:58 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365798452&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]


我識嘅律師多數搵緊三十幾萬一個月.  最差嗰個都十三萬一個月.  我諗人人唔同.



[img]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img] [/quote]
every man is defined by his friends.:smile_44:

曹雪芹 2013-6-28 22:28

點解要將自己對自己父母既怨言投射落人地度

kenufo2013 2013-6-28 22:32

[quote]原帖由 [i]CrossRoader[/i] 於 2013-6-28 08:35 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365803892&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
咁你想做律師而家開始讀都唔遲 我諗會好過你坐係度咩都唔知 酸葡萄 亂咁講野抵毀人 浪費時間



[img]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img] [/quote]
個人認為樓主行為系好幼稚,,
但系要做律師想讀律師,,,家庭環境唔好,都系無得諗啦..
我FD系英國讀LAW一年就洗左屋企50萬.
唉唉.我都想讀 但無錢

jimbo86 2013-6-29 01:16

i am sure u will change the opinion greatly & quickly when someday u need a lawyer to post bail on your behalf.
Thats the very good reason i keep good relationship with these sharks!

[quote]原帖由 [i]rayleung8838[/i] 於 2013-6-28 12:43 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365790422&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
而家D律師真係九唔搭八,水平奇低,唔怪得幾年前有個法官話香港律獅英文屎,諗諗下三皮一個月真係俾多佢地 [/quote]

digamelo

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

CrossRoader 2013-6-29 08:40

咁好多人都去讀UoL 應該唔係咁貴㗎咼 我意思係唔好比咁多藉口自己 做下reaearch諗下能力範圍可以做到咩 好過淨係講如果



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

aesopg38317 2013-6-29 10:26

agree

秋官!

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

kenufo2013 2013-6-29 17:05

[quote]原帖由 [i]CrossRoader[/i] 於 2013-6-29 08:40 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=365876167&ptid=22108016][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
咁好多人都去讀UoL 應該唔係咁貴㗎咼 我意思係唔好比咁多藉口自己 做下reaearch諗下能力範圍可以做到咩 好過淨係講如果



http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg [/quote]你可以話我系比藉口自己。但我個fd同我由細玩到大。去讀一年系真金白銀洗左50萬。自問衣家自己打工一年都無40萬。點讀?仲有屋企老豆老母要養。講咁易咩。師兄



[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]

LLL817 2013-6-29 19:14

其實律師都要看供求的,供應太多,初入行或實力不足的律師自然收入普通。但大家又想一想,年輕律師月入三萬多很差嗎? 有些律師當然每月賺取十數萬或以上,但賺不到那個價的律師也不見得就很醜。



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/android][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/androidD.jpg[/img][/url]
頁: [1] 2 3
查看完整版本: 其實而家D 律師係唔係搵得三幾皮一個月?