99999gamer 2013-12-17 13:17
PI (PERSONAL INJURY)呢？
車禍、火燭之類意外好多，應該唔愁無客掛，而且PI貌似又比CONVEYANCING複雜（I.E. 技術含量高D？），不過我聽D TUTOR講依家有RECOVERY AGENT所以都係唔好做（RECOVERY AGENT當然係犯法嘅，不過如果呢種人唔多，政府又使乜專門拍廣告教育市民，PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT又使乜專門強調唔好接CONTINGENCY FEE呢？）
jimbo86 2013-12-20 02:10
i guess in hk as contingency fees are not kosher then it can be tricky to operate, also how to money to financed the law suit?
the defense usually don't get serious to talk to u unless they saw an appointment at the court house.
In N america is very lucrative field, i knew many just specialize in that alone.
ePilot 2013-12-20 20:47
[quote]原帖由 [i]99999gamer[/i] 於 2013-12-17 13:17 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=377820167&ptid=22780166][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
PI (PERSONAL INJURY)呢？
車禍、火燭之類意外好多，應該唔愁無客掛，而且PI貌似又比CONVEYANCING複雜（I.E. 技術含量高D？），不過我聽D TUTO ... [/quote]
Recovery Agent呢個行為本身唔係犯法，其實Recovery本身係一個大行業，保險業，航運業就常常接觸同用recovery agent (當然呢D國際性專業recovery agent同醫院老鼠唔可以混為一談啦)
[[i] 本帖最後由 ePilot 於 2013-12-20 08:49 PM 編輯 [/i]]
99999gamer 2013-12-20 21:35
99999gamer 2013-12-20 21:37
jimbo86 2013-12-21 03:52
should u hate court work then u stay at the desk be a solicitor lor, it all depends at what makes u feel comfortable to do.
in reality maybe 10% of cases ended up in court, as when the settlement were off too much, as both parties knew going to court is never sure win.
several yrs ago here the ICBC [url]http://www.icbc.com/[/url]
our own car ins. tried to use use trial by jury, for the while it looked like they were able to suppress the settlement. Recently talked to a dude in this field told me is kind of back fire for the insurer.
The plaintiff lawyer were able to argue about racial profiling, prejudging the ethnicity of plaintiffs.
Now ICBC seem to back down a bit.
Some of the rules are different here, none the less is a similar game as we're common law. The transparency is still pretty high.
[[i] 本帖最後由 jimbo86 於 2013-12-21 04:03 AM 編輯 [/i]]
jimbo86 2013-12-21 03:56
that goes back to that, as the society didn't want any 3rd party to finance law suit.
Here the contingency fee is very much financed by the plaintiff's lawyer. Probably it would be illegal if a 3rd party pony money upfront for your law suit.
[quote]原帖由 [i]99999gamer[/i] 於 2013-12-20 09:35 PM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=378018085&ptid=22780166][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
總之希望唔好做爛市就得。我以前嗰行就係割喉減價，做爛市嘅 ... [/quote]
yiyiallall 2013-12-23 12:17
Lazy_Baby 2014-1-7 15:55
小弟只係觀察到, 無以前咁好搵, 但都仲生存到
jimbo86 2014-1-8 01:10
if the pie gets divided up into more slices then only benefits to the ones are on diet!
If u are a growing boy then u need just about the pie to yourself.
we all hope whatever we learned yesterday will be useful today. if not we will be writing blank paper in exams or clients.
if u are doing a reasonably good job u should get more referrals.