模擬網民 2014-1-9 15:31
如題。
[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]
模擬網民 2014-1-10 11:29
佢係行內嘅名聲如何?
[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]
※LMH517※ 2014-1-10 21:02
[url]http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realtime/news/20130718/51569868[/url]
2013年7月18日 蘋果日報 即時新聞 (Apple Daily, Instant News, July 18th, 2013)
馬恩國受紀律研訊 - 湯家驊:大狀侮辱別人不能接受
身為執業大律師的民建聯馬恩國 (Barrister Lawrence Ma) 年初在立會爆粗,辱罵政見迥異的社民連梁國雄,社民連黃浩銘早前向大律師公會投訴,不過曾任大律師公會審裁組召集人十多年的公民黨湯家驊表示,相信馬恩國當日表現不致令他除牌,或會被公會譴責。
湯家驊指出,審裁組由一位資深大律師、一位普通大律師,及一位業界以外公眾人士組成聆訊委員會展開聆訊。大律師公會將聘請一律師行轉介的一名大律師作檢控方,提出檢控的罪行相信為「Conduct unbecoming」,即在公眾場所作出不恰當行為,令行業蒙羞:「一般人對大狀期望都係比較講道理,唔會喺公眾場所用一啲粗言污語,去侮辱意見唔同嘅人,唔係可以簡單接受嘅行為。」
[url]http://billsiu.blogspot.hk/2013/07/blog-post_19.html[/url]
立會爆粗馬恩國紀律聆訊
【明報專訊】如果讀者好記性,相信都會記得民建聯成員、執業大律師馬恩國 (Counsel, Lawyer and Barrister Lawrence Y K Ma),喺今年2月出席立法會公聽會時,同社民連梁國雄鬧交,當時仲爆出喊出「Bloody Chinese」、「You are not even a fxxking Chinese」等冒犯性字句,事後社民連成員黃浩銘,以及黃毓民議員助理周峻翹,分別去信大律師公會投訴,事隔數月,大律師公會回覆話會展開紀律聆訊。投訴者覺得馬恩國身為大律師,作出粗鄙、帶有歧視及侮辱言論,係嚴重違反公會行為守則等。
話非以「大律師」開會 唔覺失當
馬恩國話,自己已就事件道歉,又話當日係受到挑釁,因此比較情緒化、控制唔到自己講唔應該講嘅嘢,但當日佢唔係以大律師身分開會,唔覺得自己係專業失當。
(19/7/2013 明報)
我以前為馬恩國寫了5篇 (You are not even a fxxxing Chinese :The Fxxxing Barrister 、The Fxxxing Barrister, part II 、The Fxxxing Barrister, part III 、香煙戰爭 及 香煙戰爭續篇),其中The Fxxxing Barrister, part III 講到他違反香港大律師公會專業守則第6(b)條:
6. It is the duty of every barrister
(a) .........
(b) not to engage in conduct (whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise) which is dishonest or which may otherwise bring the profession of barrister into disrepute, or which is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
就算當日並非以大律師身分出席立法會,罵「長毛」時卻一再強調自己是「大」律師,很明顯使大律師行業蒙羞,現在又要死撐,分割這一度使他自滿得頭昏腦脹的驕人身分。可能他看漏了眼,香港大律師公會專業守則第6(b)條包含(whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise)等字眼,不管你當時是否行使大律師的身分,同樣受約束。偷女人內衣的另一位馬大律師,犯案時也不是帶着假髮穿着律師袍,那他就不用受處分嗎?事實上他沒有受處分,因為他自動除名。馬恩國大律師 (Lawyer, Counsel and Barrister Lawrence Ma) 藉此開脫,休想!另外,他又講當日受到挑釁(provoke),因此比較情緒化。好心喇,provocation只是求情理由,provocation 用作抗辯,只可以在謀殺罪應用,温下書喇大律師。
(Source: [url]http://joycekwan20130602.blogspot.hk/2013/07/lawrencema.html[/url])
模擬網民 2014-1-13 13:15
he was studying pcll at..? which uni?
[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://i1.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]
kingme 2014-1-14 04:28
Hong Kong bar is a joke...
jimbo86 2014-1-14 16:44
I take u and the Bar assoc are kind of mutual exclusive. And a long way from there.
Is kind of a sour grape comment.
[quote]原帖由 [i]kingme[/i] 於 2014-1-14 04:28 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=379461643&ptid=22847909][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
Hong Kong bar is a joke... [/quote]
jimbo86 2014-1-14 16:47
i suppose he was lapsed in judgement momentarily.
Then again as an educated person there should be so many ways of defending oneself, really no need to sink to such a low level, swore like a logger so to speak.
Swearing can be therapeutic . Makes u forget a bad day at work, but not when u still wore a professional hat.