查看完整版本 : 你地認為保密制應唔應該凌駕公義?

cryingwife 2015-10-2 21:17

如果我係大律師,有個client 同我講佢有犯法,但要求我打甩單案,咁我應該為client 利益保密,定係為公義爆佢大鑊?



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

amychiu 2015-10-3 01:28

大律師唔會誤導法庭.  個客真係犯左法, 唔可以話無做. 只可盡量去講對人個客有利既野.

GWF_翔龍灣

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

a080250 2015-10-3 11:30

ANNEX 13 (paragraph 149)
CONFESSIONS OF GUILT

[url=http://barlist.hkba.org/the-bar/code-of-conduct/code_of_conducta13.htm]http://barlist.hkba.org/the-bar/code-of-conduct/code_of_conducta13.htm[/url]

自己睇bar code

[[i] 本帖最後由 a080250 於 2015-10-3 03:36 PM 編輯 [/i]]

yesfai 2015-10-5 12:37

保密,因為律師行業有法律約束



[url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/iphone][img=100,23]http://i.discuss.com.hk/d/images/r10/iphoneD.jpg[/img][/url]

cyberdyn50 2015-10-5 14:43

係法律上, 唔得. 係人心上, 得. But to certain extent, conscience is a luxury that comes with a high price. You can figure that out in the case of Clive Ponting.

In the case of R v Ponting, the Jury acquitted a senior civil servant who disclosed confidential information relating to the Falksland War, in breach of the Official Secrets Act 1911. Despite the direction of the judge to convict, the Jury chose to acquit him ([url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Ponting[/url]). Regrettably, he also paid the price by resigning from a senior post in the civil service.

jespo890 2015-11-4 18:31

from the above case, it is lawful to disclose the confidentiality. what is your concern ?



[url=http://m.discuss.com.hk][img=100,23]http://n2.hk/d/images/r10/mobile.jpg[/img][/url]
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 你地認為保密制應唔應該凌駕公義?