查看完整版本 : Do law students have to learn about “serious material non-disclosure”?

harefoot1040 2018-2-1 09:41 PM

Do law students have to learn about “serious material non-disclosure”?

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

henrypottinger 2018-2-2 04:48 PM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

lindachung4ever 2018-3-25 01:28 AM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

joyceleung2002 2018-4-11 03:02 AM

[quote]原帖由 [i]lindachung4ever[/i] 於 2018-3-25 01:28 AM 發表 [url=http://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=477400007&ptid=27220244][img]http://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
“ I am not sure that what his Lordship said there has been sufficiently appreciated by practitioners generally and particularly by the plaintiff’s representatives in this case.”

;P

[/quote]
恐怖片 😅

Rochefoucauld 2018-4-13 12:37 PM

好難想像係法官寫既野

koreanbbq2 2018-4-15 03:56 AM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

z05162018 2018-5-25 01:55 PM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

Slowhead 2018-6-2 09:41 PM

"I think the Judge was saying:
(1) The application for an injunction in that case shouldn't've been made ex-parte; and
(2) The applicant has failed to disclose what the Judge said in para 10 to 16 to the Deputy judge, who had granted the applicant the injunction.

There is a duty for the parties to disclosure all the relevant information to the court. So, what he said "serious material non-disclosure" is not a "legal principle" which could become a topic for LLB student. I think it is just "common sense" to any legally trained person, student or practitioner.

Because the applicant has failed to "[i]makes full and frank disclosure to the judge hearing the ex parte application" [/i](para. 10). S/he should pay the legal costs.

[[i] 本帖最後由 Slowhead 於 2018-6-2 09:57 PM 編輯 [/i]]

z05162018 2018-6-30 04:25 PM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: Do law students have to learn about “serious material non-disclosure”?