查看完整版本 : 法庭上有冇律師串個法官?

前進可愛的波菜 2020-10-31 02:59 PM

法庭上有冇律師串個法官?

🤔法庭上是否只有法官串到律師(正方或辨方)?

有冇律師聽完判決,可以即時串返個官?

有冇例子同案例?

看新聞或趣聞沒有看到過,但報紙新聞就成日見到法官串律師報道。


學校內最大是校長,
公司是老闆,
法院是法官,
不能下克上?
咁言論自由,
在這3個地點是否不適用?

🤔法律同論言自由要分開?
要跟法庭程序/流程來發言?

前進可愛的波菜 2020-10-31 03:07 PM

😂我比電影影響了,中式法庭上可以亂插咀,
九品芝麻官,包青天,方唐鏡等等...
成班人對鬧串嘴超正!
狀師串個官!官旺!

🤔但看西式法庭電影很悶咁。

天才 2020-11-3 02:25 AM

[quote]原帖由 [i]前進可愛的波菜[/i] 於 2020-10-31 02:59 PM 發表 [url=https://www.discuss.com.hk/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=527035743&ptid=29512874][img]https://www.discuss.com.hk/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url]
🤔法庭上是否只有法官串到律師(正方或辨方)?

有冇律師聽完判決,可以即時串返個官?

有冇例子同案例?

看新聞或趣聞沒有看到過,但報紙新聞就成日見到法官串律師報道。


學校內最大是校長,
公司是老闆,
法院是法官,
不能下克上?
咁言論自由,
在這3個地點是否不適用?

🤔法律同論言自由要分開?
要跟法庭程序/流程來發言? [/quote]
唔識喎應該冇掛?

古少達人 2020-11-11 09:06 PM

你估在立法局咩!

dfmtf 2020-11-12 09:37 AM

記憶所及好似有律師故意做得好差,再串埋個官
最後用審訊唔公正脫罪

一個罪犯被放走,代價係一個律師牌
俾得起錢嘅都抵俾

felixloveslinda 2020-12-22 12:00 AM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***

ngu 2020-12-22 04:36 PM

香港律師會訂明︰

[url=https://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/professionalguide/volume1/default.asp?cap=10.1.7]https://www.hklawsoc.org.hk/pub_e/professionalguide/volume1/default.asp?cap=10.1.7[/url]
[table][tr][td=2,1][size=2] [b]10.07  COURTESY[/b][/size][/td][/tr][tr][td=2,1,650]A  solicitor  should  at  all  times  be  courteous  to  the  court,  to  all witnesses and to those engaged on the other side.

[table][tr][td=2,1][size=2] [b]Commentary[/b][/size][/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]1.[/td][td=1,1,620]Legal contempt of court and the professional obligation outlined here are not identical, and a consistent pattern of rude, provocative or disruptive conduct by a solicitor, even though unpunished as contempt, might well merit disciplinary action.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]2.[/td][td=1,1,620]A solicitor should serve a witness summons in time for a witness to have adequate notice and arrange his affairs accordingly.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]3.[/td][td=1,1,620]A solicitor must not make or instruct a barrister to make an allegation which is intended only to insult, degrade or annoy the other side, a witness or any other person.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]4.[/td][td=1,1,620]This Principle also prohibits a solicitor from making or instructing a barrister to make an allegation which is scandalous.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]5.[/td][td=1,1,620]In any litigation, a solicitor should, if possible, avoid naming in open court persons who are neither parties nor witnesses if their characters would thereby be impugned. The court should be invited to receive in writing the names, addresses and other details of such third parties.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]6.[/td][td=1,1,620]A  solicitor  should  not,  in  a  plea  in  mitigation, make  or  instruct  a barrister to make an allegation which is likely to vilify or insult any person, without having first satisfied himself that there are reasonable grounds for making the statement.

[/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,30]7.[/td][td=1,1,620]A solicitor must observe the correct etiquette in court at all times and must refrain from inappropriate conduct or discourteous behaviour during the course of a hearing before the court.
[/td][/tr][/table]
[/td][/tr][/table]

晚間自信的表哥 2021-1-19 03:32 PM

*** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ***
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: 法庭上有冇律師串個法官?