• 瀏覽: 2,957
  • 回覆: 58
紫田村又會有堆狗被拋棄, 變成流浪狗, 之後又係被殺害了. 政府無安置原居動物.


鵝要健康, 鵝要燒脂.
可樂鬥家族
http://www.discuss.com.hk/viewthread.php?tid=20786999
關心下居民先喇...


紫田村又會有堆狗被拋棄, 變成流浪狗, 之後又係被殺害了. 政府無安置原居動物.
____________________________
想問下點解會變成流浪狗?



村民一定唔駛流浪街頭, 政府點都會比間公屋佢地住, 但狗就無處容身, 即係大部份係死路一條.


[隱藏]
我覺得政府都唔好大開殺界,應該幫手安置好原居動物..



[ 本帖最後由 北極熊2007 於 2010-9-29 11:27 PM 編輯 ]



引用:
原帖由 天武 於 2010-9-28 09:48 AM 發表
關心下居民先喇...
should i make a post in pet board for human?
u get yr ass to news board for this point.



some village dogs may not have owner, they just co-existing with the ppl in the village.
now they lost the land. the land that supposed to be their habitat of generation.

even some have owners, the government only compensate a public house, they can't live with their owner.










.

[ 本帖最後由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 04:11 AM 編輯 ]



引用:
原帖由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 04:04 AM 發表


should i make a post in pet board for human?
u get yr ass to news board for this point.
你當然可以發言, 不過你的見解是錯!

貓狗問題不是由政府引起, 而是由他們主人引起, 唔好學東方蘋果, 有咩事就插政府, 逃避晒一個人應該有既責任, 我想講狗主太濫觴, 好多時都只係得個發洩流馬尿, D問題循環不息甘發生! 因為從來沒人正視問題性質!

如果 政府立例, 棄置流浪狗要罰款, 紫田村民一早安排晒喇, 狗一早就上晒岸喇...係紫田村民做成流浪狗, 唔係政府....咪一味同情弱者...

[ 本帖最後由 天武 於 2010-9-29 10:19 AM 編輯 ]



引用:
原帖由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 04:09 AM 發表
some village dogs may not have owner, they just co-existing with the ppl in the village.
now they lost the land. the land that supposed to be their habitat of generation.

even some have owners, t ...
2件事! 村民同政付既事, 村民棄置家狗, 係2件事; 我便秘 可唔可以 代表 我打劫金舖?



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 carol102 於 2010-9-28 06:50 PM 發表
村民一定唔駛流浪街頭, 政府點都會比間公屋佢地住, 但狗就無處容身, 即係大部份係死路一條.
村民點樣對自己d狗又入埋政府數吖? 咁使唔使政府連村民屋企入面d蛇蟲鼠蟻都要照顧埋吖?



some village dogs may not have owner, they just co-existing with the ppl in the village.
now they lost the land. the land that supposed to be their habitat of generation.

even some have owners, the government only compensate a public house, they can't live with their owner.


i state again.







                                                                              .

[ 本帖最後由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 12:54 PM 編輯 ]



引用:
原帖由 天武 於 2010-9-29 10:22 AM 發表


2件事! 村民同政付既事, 村民棄置家狗, 係2件事; 我便秘 可唔可以 代表 我打劫金舖?
便秘? 打劫金舖? to govenment taking land from the nature? u ok?



引用:
原帖由 天武 於 2010-9-28 09:48 AM 發表
關心下居民先喇...
關心下居民先喇...ofcoz i care, but u already wrong, this is a pet board.



引用:
原帖由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 04:09 AM 發表
some village dogs may not have owner, they just co-existing with the ppl in the village.
now they lost the land. the land that supposed to be their habitat of generation.

even some have owners, t ...
想問下, 就算唔收地, 流浪狗等於唔使俾人捉? 如果之前冇人投訴, 漁記又冇做野, 點解因為收地而突然令漁記做野呢?



[隱藏]
引用:
原帖由 hyena 於 2010-9-29 12:51 PM 發表


便秘? 打劫金舖? to govenment taking land from the nature? u ok?
首先你要搞清楚, 根據香港0既法例, 所有土地都係屬於香港政府, 香港政府賣地只係將個使用權係有限期租借. 唔係永久架.



鍵盤翻頁
左右
[按此隱藏 Google 建議的相符內容]